Paperback ↠ Et dukkehjem PDF å

Paperback ↠ Et dukkehjem PDF å


Et dukkehjem [Epub] ❤ Et dukkehjem Author Henrik Ibsen – Larringtonlifecoaching.co.uk Une maison de poupe — Wikipdia Une maison de poupe Et Dukkehjem est une pice de thtre du dramaturge norvgien Henrik Ibsen cre en Elle est inscrite au registre international Mmoire du monde de l' UNE Une maison de poupe — Wikipdia Une maison de poupe Et dukkehjem est une pice de thtre du dramaturge norvgien Henrik Ibsen cre en Elle est inscrite au registre international Mmoire du monde de l' UNESCO fr Et dukkehjem Ibsen Henrik Livres Et dukkehjem A Doll's House is uite simply the most performed play in historyIt is a three act play in prose by Henrik Ibsen which critically deals with the suffocating norms of a th century marriage Et dukkehjem Wikipedia Et dukkehjem Padlet “Et dukkehjem” af Henrik Ibsen foregr i det moderne gennembrud Tidsperioden viser sig bla i de gammeldags traditioner og skikke omkring juletiden hvor brnene bla ikke m se juletret fr om aftenen Nora “Gem juletret godt Helene Brnene m Et dukkehjem spiller november | Holbk Et dukkehjem er en forestilling om de krav et moderne menneske stiller til krligheden og lidenskab sandhed og frihed og en kvinde der bliver til et menneske med al den lidelse og tvivl det medfrer Medvirkende Sicilia Gadborg Hegh Peter Christoffersen Ida Cecilie Rasmussen Mikkel Arndt og Sofie Torp Instruktr Anna Balslev Dramatiker Henrik Ibsen Scenograf Jonas Fly Et dukkehjem – Wikipedia Et dukkehjem fra Nasjonalbibliotekets privatarkivsamling Et dukkehjem er et drama av Henrik Ibsen utgitt i Stykket hadde premiere p Det kongelige Teater i Kbenhavn desember Stykket var en bitende kritikk av de tradisjonelle rollene til menn og kvinner i det viktorianske ekteskapet Et dukkehjem Wikipedia den frie encyklopdi Et dukkehjem Genre drama Karakterer Nora Helmer; Thorvald Helmer; Dr Rank; Kristine Linde; Sagfrer Krogstad; Noras tre sm brn; Anne Marie; Stuepigen; Et bybud; Manuskript Henrik Ibsen Udgivelsesdato december Forlag Gyldendalske Boghandels Forlag originalsprog dansk Urpremiere; Premiere december Premierested Et dukkehjem | Analyse | Henrik Ibsen Dramastykket ”Et dukkehjem” er skrevet af forfatteren Henrik Ibsen og er udgivet i Henrik Ibsen var en af de helt store gennembrudsforfattere og han illustrerede konflikten der fandtes mellem datidens individer og samfund Henrik Ibsen var en norsk dramatiker og digter Et dukkehjem analyse | Henrik Ibsen | Resume Dramaet “Et dukkehjem” er skrevet i af den norske dramatiker Henrik Ibsen og er et skuespil i tre akter Indledning Det moderne gennembrud har stadig stor betydning for os i dagens samfund Det var i den periode industrialiseringen fandt sted hvilket var af stor betydning for den teknologiske udvikling Desuden begyndte man at se nye tendenser i litteraturen den blev s at sige Et dukkehjem on Vimeo 'Et dukkehjem' is a hybrid art and design installation that utilizes sensor controlled digital media embedded in specially designed pieces of furniture The starting point of this work is a re reading of Henrik Ibsen's A Et dukkehjem — Henrik Ibsen | Lastfm Listen free to Henrik Ibsen – Et dukkehjem Et dukkehjem Akt Scene I Et dukkehjem Akt Scene II and tracks Discover music concerts videos and pictures with the largest catalogue online at Lastfm Et dukkehjem Rotten Tomatoes Et dukkehjem uotes There are no approved uotes yet for this movie Movie TV guides Erotic Movies Coming attractions for you 's Most Anticipated Movies What and when to watch Video Et dukkehjem Teater Nordkraft Et dukkehjem Oplev Henrik Ibsens klassiker om at tage det ndvendige opgr og friheden til at vre et selvstndigt menneske Henrik Ibsens kontroversielle mestervrk havde premiere i Kbenhavn i I dag er fortllingen om Nora fortsat ikonisk for alle menneskers lngsel efter friheden til at bestemme over eget liv og skbne Nora er gift med Helmer der snart tiltrder sin nye Bastionen Nyborg – Et dukkehjem Et dukkehjem er en forestilling om de krav et moderne menneske stiller til krlighed og lidenskab sandhed og frihed og om en kvinde der bliver til et menneske med al den lidelse og tvivl det ogs medfrer Varighed ca timer kb billet Dato okt Tags Teater Koncert start Drene bner Arrangr Nyborg Teaterforening Pladser Nummererede siddepladser Et dukkehjem vendsyssel teaterdk Et dukkehjem af Henrik Ibsen kom i til at revolutionere teaterkunsten i hele den vestlige verden Denne ’naturalistiske’ forestilling lod for frste gang teatertilskuere blive vidner til en realistisk diskussion mellem to mennesker der elsker hinanden eller TROR at de elsker hinanden Et dukkehjem by Annicken Englund Prezi Et dukkehjem Tirsdag September Overblikk Sakfrer Krogstad Fru Linde Torvald Helmer Nora Helmer Sjefen i huset Veldig kontrollerende ovenfor Nora Opptatt av et godt rykte Egoistisk Statisk Tidls Kvinnedebatten Dynamisk Starten av frste akt Kommer hjem fra julehandel Et dukkehjem Aalborg Teater Nu har jeg selvflgelig lst Et dukkehjem men hvis nu man sagde at jeg ikke havde s vil jeg sige at stykket var lykkedes med at aktualisere ved brug af mobiltelefoner og mails i stedet for breve I dag er det dog ikke lige s uset at en kvinde forlader mand og brn som det var i slutningen af tallet og stykket var derfor ikke s chokerende Udover nr Nora selvflgelig Et dukkehjem Aalborg Teater ”Et dukkehjem” blev uropfrt i Kbenhavn i og teksten og forestillingerne blev med det samme skandalse Nr man p den tid var til middagsselskab kunne man blive afkrvet lfte om at undlade at nvne Nora og Et dukkehjem af hensyn til den gode stemning I slutningen af tallet var blot tanken om en kvinde der forlader mand og brn alene fordi hun vil finde sig selv og Bonanza | TV T erne | Et dukkehjem Et dukkehjem Del Hvordan vil du dele Send mail; Del p Twitter; Del p Facebook; Kopier link; Luk Programinfo Skuespil af Henrik Ibsen med Ghita Nrby i rollen som Nora og Preben Neergaard Hanne Borchsenius og Ove Sproge i de vrige roller Programinfo Vrt Tina Munck Wilhelmsen Redaktion Tina Munck Wilhelmsen Marianne Bagger Hanne Brandt Karin Woinar Programredaktrer.

  • Paperback
  • 122 pages
  • Et dukkehjem
  • Henrik Ibsen
  • English
  • 01 October 2014
  • 9781406914832

About the Author: Henrik Ibsen

Henrik Johan Ibsen was a major Norwegian playwright largely responsible for the rise of modern realistic drama He is often referred to as the father of modern drama Ibsen is held to be the greatest of Norwegian authors and one of the most important playwrights of all time celebrated as a national symbol by NorwegiansHis plays were considered scandalous to many of his era when Victorian valu.



10 thoughts on “Et dukkehjem

  1. Ahmad Sharabiani Ahmad Sharabiani says:

    Et Dukkehjem A Doll's House and Other Plays Henrik IbsenA Doll's House is a three act play written by Norway's Henrik Ibsen It premiered at the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen Denmark on 21 December 1879 having been published earlier that month The play is set in a Norwegian town circa 1879 The play is significant for the way it deals with the fate of a married woman who at the time in Norway lacked reasonable opportunities for self fulfillment in a male dominated worldGhosts Gengangere was written in 1881 and first staged in 1882 in Chicago Illinois in a production by a Danish company on tour Like many of Ibsen's plays Ghosts is a scathing commentary on 19th century morality Because of its subject matter which includes religion venereal disease incest and euthanasia it immediately generated strong controversy and negative criticism Since then the play has fared better and is considered a “great play” that historically holds a position of “immense importance” Theater critic Maurice Valency wrote in 1963 From the standpoint of modern tragedy Ghosts strikes off in a new direction Regular tragedy dealt mainly with the unhappy conseuences of breaking the moral code Ghosts on the contrary deals with the conseuences of not breaking itتاریخ نخستین خوانش روز هفدهم ماه آگوست سال 1976میلادیعنوان خانه عروسک و اشباح؛ نویسنده هنریک ایبسن؛ مترجم مهدی فروغ؛ تهران، بنگاه ترجمه و نشر کتاب، 1339، در 289ص، موضوع دو نمایشنامه از نویسندگان نروژی سده 19معنوان خانه ی عروسک؛ نویسنده هنریک ایبسن؛ مترجم اصغر رستگار؛ چاپ گلدیس؛ چاپ اول سال 1378؛ در 139صفحه؛خانه عروسک یا «عروسکخانه»؛ داستان بیرون آمدن از توهم، و طغیان زنی به نام «نورا» را، باز می‌گوید؛ شخصیتها «نورا همسر توروالد هلمر»؛ «توروالد هلمر همسر نورا»؛ «کروگستاد وکیلی از آشنایان توروالد»؛ «خانم لینده دوست دوران کودکی نورا»؛ «دکتر رانک دوست نزدیک توروالد»؛ «باب، امی و ایوار سه فرزنده خانواده هلمر»؛ «آن ماری خدمتکار خانواده هلمر»؛ و «پدر نورا» که مرده استداستان در «کریستیانیا» و در طی سه روز از ایام هفته ی میلاد مسیح، روی می‌دهد؛ «توروالد هلمر» حقوقدانی خودبین ولی با وجدان است، به تازگی در بانک ترفیع رتبه پیدا کرده، و همسرش «نورا» که زنی زیبا، مو بور، و ظاهراً نادان، و بوالهوس است، احساس می‌کند، که آنها می‌توانند در جشن کریسمس، کمی ولخرجی کنند؛ «هلمر» که با «نورا» همچون بچه‌ ها رفتار می‌کند، و او را «جوجه کاکلی» می‌نامد، به وی هشدار میدهد، که بیشتر مواظب باشد، چون همیشه پول، در پنجه‌ های او آسان خرج می‌شود، ولی «نورا» مدام تقاضای پول بیشتری می‌کند؛ «خانم لیندن» یکی از دوستان بیوه و پیر «نورا»، به او می‌گوید خبر ترفیع شوهر او را شنیده، و از «نورا» می‌خواهد که کاری در بانک شوهرش برای وی پیدا کند؛ «هلمر» در نخستین سال ازدواجشان، بسیار مریض و علیل بوده، و برای نجات زندگی خویش، باید مسافرتی به «ایتالیا» می‌کرد؛ «نورا» پول لازم را قرض کرد، ولی به «هلمر» گفت که ارث کمی از پدرش به ارث برده است؛ او ترتیبی داد تا نزول قرضش را، از بابت کرایه ی لباس‌ها و گاهی با یافتن کارهای پنهان از شوهرش، بپردازدقرض تقریباً ادا شده است؛ «هلمر» موافقت می‌کند، که کار شخصی به نام «نیلز کروگستاد» را، که حقوقدان مرموزی ست، و محکوم به جعل اسناد شده، به خانم «لیندن» دوست «نورا» تفویض نماید؛ ولی «کروگستاد» همان مردی ست که «نورا» از او پول قرض کرده بود، و او «نورا» را تهدید می‌کند، که اگر کارش را از دست بدهد، موضوع قرض را برای شوهر «نورا» فاش خواهد نمود؛ او همچنین متوجه می‌شود، پدر «نورا» که قرار بود پای سند قرض را امضاء کند، در آن زمان مرده بوده است؛ «نورا» سرانجام تصدیق می‌کند، که امضای پدرش را جعل کرده، و سعی می‌نماید شوهر را متقاعد نماید، که «کروگستاد» را که سعی دارد، اعتبار خود را در اجتماع به دست آورد، در شغل خود نگه دارد؛ ولی «هلمر» می‌گوید که «کروگستاد» یک کلاش جاعل است، و به جایگزینی او اصرار می‌ورزدخانم لیندن، که از دوستان قدیمی «کروگستاد» یشمار می‌آید، قول می‌دهد ،که از طرف «نورا» از او خواهش و تمنا کند، ولی درمییابد، که او از شهر بیرون رفته است؛ «کروگستاد» نامه‌ ای به «هلمر» مینویسد، و تمام ماجرا را تعریف می‌کند؛ به این ترتیب «نورا» کاملاً مأیوس می‌شود؛ او نامه را در جعبه نامه‌ ها می‌یابد، اما نمی‌تواند به نحوی آن را از بین ببرد، چون کلید جعبه پیش همسر است؛ هر کار که ممکن است می‌کند تا مانع از خواندن آن نامه، توسط شوهرش شود؛ آنها به یک مجلس بالماسکه در آپارتمان بالایی می‌روند؛ در آن جشن یکی از دوستانشان، دکتر «رانک» نیز با آنهاست؛ دکتر می‌داند که در حال مرگ است، و لذا نومیدانه سودای عشق «نورا» را در سر می‌پروراند؛نورا لباسی ایتالیایی می‌پوشد، و «تارانتلا» می‌رقصد و سعی دارد صورت ظاهر را حفظ کند، تا ناراحتی‌ اش هویدا نگردد؛ «نورا» در حالتی از یأس و نومیدی، تصمیم می‌گیرد که اگر شوهرش نامه را بیابد، خودکشی کند؛ وقتی «هلمر» نامه را می‌خواهد، او را به جرمی بزرگ متهم می‌کند، جرمی که «هلمر» را از میان خواهد برد؛ «هلمر» به «نورا» می‌گوید که لایق معاشرت فرزندانشان نیست؛ درست‌کاری «هلمر» خیلی بیش از انتظار و پیش بینی «نورا»ست؛ «کروگستاد» سند وعده دار را پس می‌فرستد، و «هلمر» با خوشحالی فریاد می‌زند، که نجات یافته است؛ ولی ضربه عمیقی بر روح «نورا» وارد شده؛ و در حقیقت بیش از آن نمی‌تواند در خانه ی شوهرش بماند، و سرانجام در یک صحنه ی دراماتیک، «هلمر» را ترک می‌کند، تا خود به تنهایی زندگی تازه ای را آغاز کند؛ و بیش از آنکه متلون مزاج باشد، به مسائل زندگی بیندیشد؛ او امید کوچکی به «هلمر» می‌دهد، که اگر معجزه‌ ای رخ دهد، شاید آنان دوباره زندگی را با هم از نو آغاز کنند؛ ؛تاریخ بهنگام رسانی 21061399هجری خورشیدی؛ ا شربیانی

  2. Lisa Lisa says:

    Ibsen’s famous A Doll’s House is a landmark in the development of truly independent female heroines rejecting the patriarchy they were socialised to accept unconditionally Nora the main character fails to make her husband understand that their perception of reality is incompatible as he keeps seeing her as a doll acting out a pretty life for his pleasure and reputation In the original version Nora shows the path to independence by opting for the uncertain future of a life lived alone and independently but Ibsen was confronted with dominant misogyny and power play when German theatres in 1880 asked for “an alternative ending” yes one in which Nora is emotionally blackmailed into staying with her family for the sake of the children Curtain falls on that “barbaric act of violence” as Ibsen himself put it when commenting on the politically correct alternative a rewriting of literature to suit a misogynistic society protective of all documentation of the role of womenWell unfortunately we are watching an all too real alternative ending to a century of increasing women’s rights at the moment as well Across the world alternatives to freedom of speech movement and choice are implemented in “so called democratic processes” hijacked by the resurrected mindsets of 19th century white male heterosexual pseudo Christian figures Domestic violence rape culture law making against family planning and abortion the alternatives to women’s rights are scarily real Nora keep walking

  3. Sean Barrs Sean Barrs says:

    Imagine what it would be like to live in a doll’s house it's a house in which you are controlled and have no power to make any strong decisions; it's a house in which you are a play thing for someone else’s entertainment This sounds a lot like a bad marriage so it's a house in which your husband holds the purse strings so to speak and leaves you with no control over your family’s finances Indeed your husband keeps you on a very tight leash Such is the perceived life of Nora Helma Yet this work is in favour of womenNote the word perceived for that is the appearance Nora gives to the outer world Indeed the doll’s house is a metaphor for Nora’s life in which she takes on the role of a doll Her husband is now in charge and before then her farther She has no idea who or what she is because she has been conditioned by society to behave in the manner of an acceptable wife which is one that obeys her husband’s wishes The result is a woman who appears week and controllable but she has kept a big big secret from her husband that challenges everything he thinks her to be She this simple minded doll has managed to borrow money something unheard of for a women of this time to keep her family afloat whilst her husband was too ill to work So yeah this play is very feminist Ibsen has used Nora’s situation to comment on the ridiculous nature of marriage in the nineteenth century The play is rooted in the then rising field of naturalism which endeavoured to portray life accurately with no idealisations; thus Nora’s marriage can be seen as an accurate portrayal of what most women had to put up with in their marriages Ibsen shocked his audineceMoreover this means that the play was an absolute shocker to the Victorian audience This is not because of Nora’s disobedience but the way her marriage has been used as a disguise to hide her freedom Despite being in a controlling marriage she had managed to be able to borrow money off her own accord by herself This indicates that Nora’s role as a housewife was nothing than a charade because she did in fact have some freedom to make her own choices such as the life changing one she makes at the end of the play Thus the play was a milestone for uestioning the traditional view of marriage; it suggested that marriage was overbearing and controlling but if one was careful they could gain some freedom from their bigoted spouse; it suggested that marriage appeared like a doll’s house in which the doll was destined to be free

  4. Ahmad Sharabiani Ahmad Sharabiani says:

    Dukkehjem A Doll House A doll's House Henrik IbsenA Doll's House is a three act play written by Henrik Ibsen It premiered at the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen Denmark on 21 December 1879 having been published earlier that month The play is set in a Norwegian town circa 1879 Act One The play opens at Christmas time as Nora Helmer enters her home carrying many packages Nora's husband Torvald is working in his study when she arrives He playfully rebukes her for spending so much money on Christmas gifts calling her his little suirrel He teases her about how the previous year she had spent weeks making gifts and ornaments by hand because money was scarce This year Torvald is due a promotion at the bank where he works so Nora feels that they can let themselves go a little The maid announces two visitors Mrs Kristine Linde an old friend of Nora's who has come seeking employment; and Dr Rank a close friend of the family who is let into the study Kristine has had a difficult few years ever since her husband died leaving her with no money or children Nora says that things have not been easy for them either Torvald became sick and they had to travel to Italy so he could recover Kristine explains that when her mother was ill she had to take care of her brothers but now that they are grown she feels her life is unspeakably empty Nora promises to talk to Torvald about finding her a job Kristine gently tells Nora that she is like a child Nora is offended so she teases the idea that she got money from some admirer so they could travel to Italy to improve Torvald's health She told Torvald that her father gave her the money but in fact she managed to illegally borrow it without his knowledge because women couldn't do anything economical like signing checks without their husband Over the years she has been secretly working and saving up to pay it off Act Two Christine arrives to help Nora repair a dress for a costume function that she and Torvald plan to attend the next day Torvald returns from the bank and Nora pleads with him to reinstate Krogstad claiming she is worried Krogstad will publish libelous articles about Torvald and ruin his career Torvald dismisses her fears and explains that although Krogstad is a good worker and seems to have turned his life around he must be fired because he is too familial around Torvald in front of other bank personnel Torvald then retires to his study to work Dr Rank the family friend arrives Nora asks him for a favor but Rank responds by revealing that he has entered the terminal stage of tuberculosis of the spine and that he has always been secretly in love with her Nora tries to deny the first revelation and make light of it but is disturbed by his declaration of love She then clumsily attempts to tell him that she is not in love with him but that she loves him dearly as a friend Act Three Kristine tells Krogstad that she only married her husband because she had no other means to support her sick mother and young siblings and that she has returned to offer him her love again She believes that he would not have stooped to unethical behavior if he had not been devastated by her abandonment and been in dire financial straits Krogstad changes his mind and offers to take back his letter from Torvald However Kristine decides that Torvald should know the truth for the sake of his and Nora's marriage After literally dragging Nora home from the party Torvald goes to check his mail but is interrupted by Dr Rank who has followed them Dr Rank chats for a while conveying obliuely to Nora that this is a final goodbye as he has determined that his death is near Dr Rank leaves and Torvald retrieves his letters As he reads them Nora steels herself to take her life Torvald confronts her with Krogstad's letter Enraged he declares that he is now completely in Krogstad's power; he must yield to Krogstad's demands and keep uiet about the whole affair He berates Nora calling her a dishonest and immoral woman and telling her that she is unfit to raise their children He says that from now on their marriage will be only a matter of appearances عنوانها خانه عروسک و اشباح؛ عروسکخانه؛ نویسنده هنریک ایبسن؛ تاریخ نخستین خوانش ماه آگوست سال 1976 میلادیعنوان خانه عروسک و اشباح؛ نویسنده هنریک ایبسن؛ مترجم مهدی فروغ؛ تهران، بنگاه ترجمه و نشر کتاب، 1339، در 289 ص، موضوع دو نمایشنامه از نویسندگان نروژی سده 19 معنوان عروسکخانه؛ نویسنده هنریک ایبسن؛ مترجم منوچهر انور؛ تهران، کارنامه، 1385، در 310 ص، نمایشنامه نروژی در سه پرده به همراه ایبسن شاعر، و چند اشاره به چالش ترجمه؛ پیشتر از اینها این نمایشنامه با عنوان «خانه عرسک» به همراه نمایشنامه ی «اشباح» ایبسن، دو نمایشنامه در یک جلد، منتشر شده است؛ خانه عروسک یا «عروسکخانه» داستان بیرون آمدن از توهم، و طغیان زنی به نام «نورا» را شرح می‌دهد داستان در مدت سه روز از ایام هفته میلاد مسیح، رخ می‌دهد «توروالد هلمر» که حقوقدانی خودبین، ولی با وجدان است، به تازگی در بانک، ترفیع رتبه پیدا کرده، و همسرش «نورا» که زنی زیبا، مو بور، و ظاهراً نادان و بوالهوس است، احساس می‌کند، که آن‌ها می‌توانند در جشن «کریسمس» قدری ولخرجی کنند، «هلمر» که با «نورا» همچون بچه‌ ای رفتار می‌کند، و او را «جوجه کاکلی» می‌نامد، وی را آگاه می‌سازد، که بیشتر مواظب باشد، چون همیشه پول در پنجه‌ های او سهواً خرج می‌شود، ولی «نورا» مدام پول بیشتری می‌خواهد خانم «لیندن»، یکی از دوستان بیوه، و پیر «نورا» به او می‌گوید، که خبر ترفیع شوهرش را شنیده، و از «نورا» می‌خواهد، که کاری در بانک شوهرش، برای وی پیدا کند «نورا» با غرور به دوستش می‌گوید، که او هم پول زیادی به دست آورده‌ است «هلمر» در نخستین سال ازدواجش، بسیار مریض و علیل بود، و برای نجات زندگیش، باید مسافرتی به «ایتالیا» می‌کرد «نورا» پول لازم را قرض کرد، ولی به «هلمر» گفت، که پول کمی از پدرش به ارث برده‌ است او ترتیبی داده تا نزول پول را از بابت کرایه لباس‌هایش، و گاهی با یافتن کارهای پنهانی از شوهرش، بپردازد؛ ولی حالا قرض تقریباً ادا شده‌ است «هلمر» موافقت می‌کند، که کار شخصی به نام «نیلز کروگستاد» را، که حقوقدان مرموزی است، و محکوم به جعل اسناد شده، به خانم «لیندن» دوست «نورا» تفویض نماید ولی «کروگستاد» همان مردی است، که «نورا» از او پول قرض کرده بود، و او «نورا» را تهدید می‌کند، که اگر کارش را از دست بدهد، موضوع قرض را برای شوهرش فاش خواهد نمود او همچنین متوجه می‌شود پدر «نو»را که قرار بود پای سند قرض را امضاء کند، در آن زمان مرده بوده‌ «نورا» سرانجام تصدیق می‌کند، که امضای پدرش را جعل کرده، و سعی می‌نماید شوهرش را متقاعد نماید، که «کروگستاد» را که سعی می‌کند اعتبار خود را در اجتماع به دست آورد، در شغل خود نگه دارد؛ ولی «هلمر» می‌گوید که «کروگستاد» یک کلاش جاعل است و در تعویض او اصرار می‌ورزد خانم «لیندن» که از دوستان قدیمی «کروگستاد» محسوب می‌شود، قول می‌دهد که از طرف «نورا» از او خواهش و تمنا کند، ولی ناگهان درمییابد که او از شهر بیرون رفته‌ است در همین ضمن «کروگستاد»، نامه‌ ای به هلمر نوشته، و تمام جریان را تعریف می‌کند، و به این ترتیب «نورا» کاملاً مأیوس می‌شود او نامه را در جعبه نامه‌ ها می‌یابد، اما نمی‌تواند به نحوی آن را از بین ببرد، چون کلید جعبه پیش شوهر است او هر کاری که ممکن است می‌کند تا مانع از خواندن آن نامه توسط شوهرش شود آنها به یک مجلس بالماسکه در آپارتمان بالایی می‌روند در این جشن یکی از دوستانشان، دکتر «رانک» نیز با آنهاست دکتر می‌داند که در حال مرگ است، و لذا نومیدانه سودای عشق «نورا» را در سر می‌پروراند «نورا» لباسی ایتالیایی می‌پوشد و «تارانتلا» می‌رقصد، و سعی دارد صورت ظاهر را حفظ کند و حتی المقدور ناراحتی‌اش هویدا نگردد نورا در حالتی از یأس و نومیدی تصمیم می‌گیرد، که اگر شوهرش نامه را بیابد، خودکشی کند وقتی «هلمر» نامه را می‌خواهد او را به جرمی بزرگ متهم می‌کند، جرمی که هلمر را از میان خواهد برد هلمر به نورا می‌گوید که لایق معاشرت فرزندانشان نیست درست‌کاری هلمر خیلی بیش از انتظار و پیش‌بینی نورا است کروگستاد سند وعده دار را پس می‌فرستد، و هلمر با خوشحالی فریاد می‌زند، که نجات یافته است؛ ولی ضربه عمیقی بر روح نورا وارد شده‌ است و در حقیقت بیش از آن نمی‌تواند، در خانه شوهرش بماند و سرانجام در یک صحنه دراماتیک هلمر را ترک می‌کند، تا خودش به تنهایی زندگی جدیدی را آغاز کند و بیش از آنکه متلون مزاج باشد به مسائل زندگی بیندیشد او امید کوچکی به هلمر می‌دهد که اگر معجزه‌ ای رخ دهد، شاید آنان دوباره زندگی را با هم از نو آغاز کنند ا شربیانی

  5. Tadiana ✩Night Owl☽ Tadiana ✩Night Owl☽ says:

    This is the story of a marriage that superficially seems happy but a critical turn of events reveals a sham relationshipTorvald and Nora Helmer who've had some financial struggles are delighted because Torvald has gotten major promotion at the bank where he works But Nora behind her lightheartedness and childish behavior encouraged always by Torvald who calls her diminutive vaguely or sometimes explicitly insulting names names like my sweet tooth and little spendthrift is hiding a major secret She borrowed a substantial sum of money a few years ago to finance a trip to Italy to help Torvald recover from a major illness She told Torvald the money was left to her by her father but it was actually loaned to her by one Nils Krogstad and she has been slowly paying it back But now Nils is threatening to tell Nora's husband especially since he realized that Nora forged her father's signature as co signer of the noteI first read this play many years ago as a college English major and frankly it didn't leave much of an impression on me at the time But rereading this now as a married woman with children the utter wrongness and superficiality of Torvald's and Nora's relationship hits me hard Almost everything Torvald says to Nora diminishes her as a personNow now the little lark's wings mustn't droop Come on don't be a sulky suirrel Nora in turn treats her children especially her daughter with the same type of carelessness of their value as a person As the problem of the forged promissory looms closer to disclosure Nora becomes frantic But she still thinks that Torvald who has shown nothing but disdain for her mind and financial ability will stand by her and protect her if her misdeed which was done because of her love and concern for her husband becomes publicThis is one of the earliest feminist works of literature written in 1879 by Norwegian playwright Henrik Ibsen It's hard to believe that this hard hitting play about a woman who realizes she's been treated as a mindless doll all her life by her father and then her husband and what she decides to do about it was written over 130 years ago It raises some important uestions of true communication and finding yourself not just for women but for all people British actress Hattie Morahan who played Nora made some comments about it that really struck me the things Ibsen writes mean it ceases to be about a particular milieu and becomes about marriage or partnership and money These are universal anxieties and it seems from talking to people that it resonates in the most visceral way especially if they are or have been in a difficult relationship Someone said to me the other night 'That's the play that broke my parents' marriage up' It shines a very harsh light on the messy heart of relationships and how difficult it can be to be honest with another human being even if you love them I'll admit that the ending leaves me unsettled with its burning all bridges approach Although I have some sympathy with German actress Hedwig Niemann Raabe who famously refused to perform the play unless Ibsen rewrote the ending I don't think changing it was the right decision from a literary point of view As a literary work the ending is tremendously powerful However as a practical guide to life I'm not convinced that what Nora does is right view spoiler She leaves her husband which I can understand he's tremendously selfish and has never treated her as anything but a mindless doll Still giving him at least a chance to change once she realizes that they both need that change would seem like the right thing to do in real life What bothers me is Nora also leaving her children and cutting off all communication with them as well at least until she finds herself as a person hide spoiler

  6. Brina Brina says:

    I read Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House back in high school as reuired reading but did not grasp the scope of his masterpiece then Ibsen penned his classic play about the story of Nora and Thorvald Helmer at a time in his life when he was coping with his former love Laura being confined to an insane asylum In 1872 Laura married a man other than Ibsen and he fell ill with a lethal disease Their doctors prescribed a southern climate but Laura did not have funds to move her husband to such a climate so she borrowed the money from a trusting friend On her return she still did not have the money to cover the loan so she forged a bank note which subseuently lead to her entering the asylum Ibsen started work on A Doll's House shortly after this episode took place Clearly it is an example of art imitating life as Nora is Laura Thorvald her husband et al What I found the most interesting is Ibsen's view on the place of women in society He believed that women were not objects who were chained to their husbands with no voice in society On the contrary I feel he saw women as independent thinkers who were free to make their own decisions rather than the dolls stuck living their lives according to their husbands' wills We see this with both the characters of Nora and Kristin Linde I read A Doll's House in less than an hour as the text is less than one hundred pages long It is what is contained in these pages that packs a punch and why A Doll's House has become timeless A classic I recommend to all who haven't read it before

  7. Chelsea Chelsea says:

    Mr S let me make myself very clear I will never never believe that Ibsen intended for Nora's grabbing of her husband's cloak as she ran out the door to indicate his guilt in her implied suicide It was Christmas In Norway The woman was coldThis is why I didn't do so well in your class isn't it Mr S?

  8. David David says:

    First things first Nora the protagonist of Ibsen's A Doll's House is a twit There's no getting around it We may choose to assign blame for her twittishness to her husband her milieu or her era but this will never adeuately mitigate her essential twit nature to that reader or spectator of the play who must endure her self identification as her husband's 'suirrel' or her childlike idiocy I myself couldn't stop wondering if Nora is an actual twit ie a twit absolutely regardless of her context or relative twit ie a woman who seems a twit to us now as a result of the changes in custom gender roles and society itself And I haven't of course ruled out a combination of the twoThen my mind became even scrupulous Was my judgment that Nora is a twit itself a condition of my entitled position in a still phallocentric society? I'm not kidding I actually thought this This is what a culture of loudly warring intellectual discourses does to a man Am I guilty because I think Nora is twit?Well I abandoned that idea Now I am convinced that she really is a twit but now I ascribe some of her twittishness to the artificiality of drama itself especially at the end of the nineteenth century I think I've temporarily settled on this opinion But ask me tomorrow and who knows?Since I've spent so much time convicting Nora of being a twit it might seem surprising that I've given this play four stars But really—there are plenty of fine stories to be told about twits and their ostensible transformations into non twits We shouldn't discriminate against twits Don't they have hopes dreams sorrows disappointments like the rest of us? A Doll's House is the story of a silly naive Norwegian wife named Nora who is being blackmailed by an unsavory bank clerk; apparently she forged a document some time before but the backstory is too contorted and contrived to bother with here I'm than a little annoyed that Ibsen couldn't come up with a elegant MacGuffin—one that's not entirely reliant upon Nora's guileless or stupid as you see it admission of wrongdoing to her blackmailer Nora works overtime to keep her husband Torvald from finding out about her transgression Here a cultural difference comes into play given the circumstances it's difficult for a modern audience to imagine that Torvald would be outraged at her confession Eventually he does find out though and rips Nora a proverbial new one This leads up to a famous and infamous confrontation between husband and wife punctuated by Nora's door slam heard 'round the worldIt's a fascinating and prescient play no doubt but it's also than a little creaky—at least in translation The conclusion I think retains much of its provocation today well over a hundred years later It is very difficult to watch or read the play and not react to Nora She will always be subject to moral condemnation but she's intriguing—even in her twittishness—because she isn't entirely right or wrong She's just human In an often infuriating way

  9. stephanie stephanie says:

    oh nora you are much maligned and yet i wonder why people find you so much annoying than emma bovary etc i think there's so much about this play as a historical document that i appreciate and enjoy and love that sometimes i forget it's supposed to be a PLAY that said i don't think nora was supposed to be entirely sympathetic i think her annoying behaviors are supposed to get on your nerves but somewhere i think Ibsen hoped that you would see the way she acts is not simply who she is but because of how she is brought up the situation she is in the situation women are in the realities of life for a woman in that time fascinating in general and a true testament to Ibsen that this is even being discussed today i kind of adore this play and not because i am a feminist

  10. Carlie Carlie says:

    I did not like this book because the main character got on my last nerves A supposedly intelligent woman pretending to be an idiot to fit her husband's idea of what women are like? And in the end abandons her family I have no sympathy for characters who punish the innocent children of their idiotic patnerships in order to find themselves Then again I read this in high school so perhaps if I reread it I'll see what all the hoopla surrounding it is aboutNo wonder people hate feminists If this is what passes for feminist fare then I don't want to be one any Women don't have to abandon their children to free themselves from this patriarchal society It only makes you look like a bad selfish mother A real feminist would not marry an idiot for money not love and produce offspring with him only to scar them for life later by abandoning them

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *